Bedoukian   RussellIPM   Pherobank   Piezo-Electric-Micro-Sprayer


Home

Animal Taxa
  Order Index
  Families A-Z
  » Genus A-Z
  Species A-Z
  Common Names A-Z
  All Families
  All Common Names

Plant Taxa
Floral Taxa
Semiochemicals
Plant Compounds
Floral Compounds
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
ID Tools
Control
Invasive spp.
References
Abstract
Guide
Alpha Scents
PheroBio
InsectScience
E-EcoNex
Counterpart Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend

« Previous GenusCoptotermes    Next GenusCora »

Semiochemicals of Genus Coquillettidia

Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Uniramia
Class: Insecta
Order: Diptera
Family: Culicidae
Subfamily: Culicinae
Tribe: 
Discuss this Genus
  Edit this Record
  Help



Bedoukain RussellIPM

Semiochemical(s):

Coquillettidia crassipes Wulp
 
               Miyagi I  1978  Jpn. J. Sanit. Zool.  29: 305   
    CO2    Relative ratio of the component   (*) indicates that compound is active   A
Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone
 
L
Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker
 
Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
g -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram
 
 
 
 
Coquillettidia perturbans Walker
 
               Hoel DF  2009  J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc.  25: 47   
    l-lactic acid    Relative ratio of the component   (*) indicates that compound is active   A
Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone
 
L
Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker
 
Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
g -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram
 
Florida, USA 
    delta1-octen-3-ol    Relative ratio of the component   (*) indicates that compound is active    
Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker
 
Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
g -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram
 
 
    CO2    Relative ratio of the component   (*) indicates that compound is active    
Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker
 
Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
g -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram
 
 
 
               Kline DL  1998  J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc.  14: 289   
    CO2    Relative ratio of the component   (*) indicates that compound is active   A
Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone
 
L
Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker
 
Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
g -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram
 
 
    4-2Kt    Relative ratio of the component   (*) indicates that compound is active    
Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker
 
Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
g -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram
 
 
 
 
Coquillettidia richiardii Ficalbi
 
               Marinkovic ZJ  2014  Biologia  69: 522   
    CO2    Relative ratio of the component   (*) indicates that compound is active   A
Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone
 
Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker
 
Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
g -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram
 
Croatia 
 
 
Reference(s):

Marinkovic, Z.J., Hackenberger, B.K., and Merdic, E. 2014. Maximum radius of carbon dioxide baited trap impact in woodland: implications for host-finding by mosquitoes. Biologia. 69:522-529.
 
Hoel, D.F., Kline, D.L., and Allan, S.A. 2009. Evaluation of six mosquito traps for collection of Aedes albopictus and associated mosquito species in a suburban setting in north central Florida. J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc. 25:47-57.
 
Kline, D.L., and Mann, M.O. 1998. Evaluation of butanone, carbon dioxide, and 1-octen-3-ol as attractants for mosquitoes associated with north central Florida bay and cypress swamps. J. Am. Mosq. Contr. Assoc. 14:289-297.
 
Miyagi, I., and Toma, T. 1978. Studies on the mosquitoes in the Yaeyama islands, Japan. 2. Notes on the non-anopheline mosquitoes collected at Ishigaki-jima, 1975-1976. Jpn. J. Sanit. Zool. 29:305-312.
 

 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
Ⓒ 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 9-June-2024